fdfdfdfd

Oh, yeah. Each post should contain more than 150+ words to make the rp post count.

any objections?

Question: What will determine the top rper? What is the criteria that determines that a member is the top rper? And I think each badge should also have a title along with it, like the ones in TPW contests. Here are my suggestions:

TRM for the 1st time: Candy Prince/Candy Princess
TRM for 3 consecutive months: Genius
TRM for 6 consecutive months: Mad Genius
TRM for 10 consecutive months: God Of Rp/Supreme Rper

LOL @ Candy Prince. I think there should be a "Candy Princess" version for girls. I think this would be need. Reward the person who is outstanding. However, I believe post minimums should be higher than 150 words since most of the active members can do 150 with their eyes closed. Maybe 250 or 300 instead. Top RPer, right? 150 would be better for like a Top 3 or Top 5.

I like what Eden's suggesting, increase the word limit but would you mind elaborating on it a bit further Eden-kun? What word post limit would determine the top rper? What if more than one can satisfy the condition? what then?

It's the requirements that really need to be hammered out. I'm not certain what everyone would want to do. I just know for certain that 150 words is too low for a minimum. I also believe there should be a quality requirement, as well as a topic's flow. For instance, we could take a candidate's topic, read it, and see how well it reads. Does it have minimal grammar issues, is each post made chronologically, does each post make sense, etc.

We could pick like a group of 5 people who have completed at least 2 topics and then pick one from each person to read over and collaborate on grading as a team. Us staff, that is.

Eden Alexandria wrote:It's the requirements that really need to be hammered out. I'm not certain what everyone would want to do. I just know for certain that 150 words is too low for a minimum. I also believe there should be a quality requirement, as well as a topic's flow. For instance, we could take a candidate's topic, read it, and see how well it reads. Does it have minimal grammar issues, is each post made chronologically, does each post make sense, etc.

We could pick like a group of 5 people who have completed at least 2 topics and then pick one from each person to read over and collaborate on grading as a team. Us staff, that is.

[Only admins are allowed to see this link]

I agree with this.

Based on the suggestions provided, here's what I've formulated:

TRM Suggested announcement:

Code:

Very mice epi. Rhanx for makimg this.

Anyway im not gonna post this now. Most likely nxt week or the 1st of oxtober

Yw bud. ^-^

That's good, until then it's open for suggestions and alterations; if someone finds anything questionable please do point it out.